Quick Answer
The Samsung Exynos 1380 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 are both mid-range mobile processors, but they target different performance tiers. The Exynos 1380 generally offers more powerful CPU and GPU performance, while the Snapdragon 695 is known for its strong power efficiency and widespread adoption in budget-friendly devices.
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695: Full Comparison
Introduction
When evaluating mid-range smartphones, the processor is a critical component that influences overall performance, efficiency, and feature support. This comparison examines two popular chipsets: Samsung’s Exynos 1380 and Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 695. Understanding their architectural differences, performance capabilities, and typical use cases can help clarify which devices might be a better fit for specific user needs, from everyday tasks to more demanding applications.
Manufacturing Process & Architecture
The fundamental design and manufacturing technology of a chipset significantly impact its efficiency and performance potential.
- Samsung Exynos 1380: This chip is fabricated using a 5-nanometer (5nm) process. It features an octa-core CPU configuration with four high-performance Cortex-A78 cores and four power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores.
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 695: Built on a 6nm process, it also uses an octa-core CPU setup. Its configuration includes two performance Kryo 660 Gold cores (based on Cortex-A78) and six efficiency Kryo 660 Silver cores (based on Cortex-A55).
The more advanced 5nm process of the Exynos 1380 typically allows for better power efficiency at similar performance levels or higher peak performance within a similar power envelope compared to the 6nm Snapdragon 695.
CPU & General Performance
CPU performance dictates how swiftly a device handles tasks like app launches, multitasking, and general system navigation.
- Exynos 1380: With four Cortex-A78 cores, it has a higher concentration of performance-oriented cores. This setup generally provides a noticeable advantage in multi-threaded workloads and sustained performance, making it feel more responsive during intensive use.
- Snapdragon 695: Its configuration of two A78-derived cores and six A55 cores is balanced for efficiency. It delivers capable performance for everyday social media, web browsing, and light gaming, but may show limitations in more demanding scenarios compared to the Exynos chip.
In benchmark tests and real-world usage, the Exynos 1380 typically scores higher in CPU-intensive tasks.
GPU & Gaming Performance
The Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) is crucial for gaming, UI animations, and any graphically demanding application.
- Exynos 1380: It utilizes a Mali-G68 MP5 GPU. This GPU offers a significant step up in graphical horsepower, enabling smoother gameplay at higher graphics settings in popular mobile titles. It supports more advanced graphics APIs and features.
- Snapdragon 695: This chip employs an Adreno 619 GPU. It is a competent GPU for casual gaming and can handle many games at medium to low settings. However, for high-frame-rate gaming or titles with advanced graphics, its performance is more limited.
The Mali-G68 MP5 in the Exynos 1380 generally provides a superior gaming experience compared to the Adreno 619.
Connectivity & Features
Modern chipsets integrate modems and support for various wireless standards and peripheral technologies.
- Exynos 1380: It integrates a 5G modem with Sub-6GHz support. It also typically supports Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.2, and can handle higher-resolution camera sensors (up to 200MP). It often includes a more advanced image signal processor (ISP).
- Snapdragon 695: Also features an integrated 5G modem (Snapdragon X51) with Sub-6GHz support. It supports Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.2, and camera sensors up to 108MP. Its ISP is capable but may not support as many concurrent high-resolution streams as the Exynos ISP.
The Exynos 1380 often holds an edge in peak connectivity (Wi-Fi 6) and camera hardware support.
Power Efficiency & Thermal Management
Efficiency affects battery life and how well a chip sustains performance without overheating.
- Snapdragon 695: The 6nm process and CPU configuration are optimized for excellent power efficiency. Devices using this chip are frequently noted for their long battery life, as it manages less demanding tasks with minimal power draw.
- Exynos 1380: While its 5nm process is efficient, its higher-performance design can consume more power under load. Thermal management depends heavily on the device manufacturer’s cooling solution, but it is generally designed to handle its performance level adequately.
The Snapdragon 695 is often associated with very good battery endurance, while the Exynos 1380 balances higher performance with reasonable efficiency.
Comparison Table: Exynos 1380 vs Snapdragon 695
| Feature | Samsung Exynos 1380 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing Process | 5nm | 6nm |
| CPU Architecture | Octa-core: 4x Cortex-A78 @ 2.4GHz + 4x Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz | Octa-core: 2x Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78) @ 2.2GHz + 6x Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55) @ 1.7GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 | Adreno 619 |
| AI Processing | Dedicated NPU | Hexagon Tensor Accelerator (6th gen) |
| 5G Modem | Integrated (Sub-6GHz) | Integrated Snapdragon X51 (Sub-6GHz) |
| Wi-Fi Support | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Max Display Support | FHD+ @ 144Hz | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Max Camera Support | Up to 200MP single / 64+16+16MP triple | Up to 108MP single / 32+16MP dual |
| Video Capture | 4K @ 30fps | 1080p @ 60fps / 4K @ 30fps |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Typical Device Tier | Upper mid-range | Lower to mid mid-range |
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What is the main difference between the Exynos 1380 and Snapdragon 695?
The primary difference lies in performance tier and manufacturing process. The Exynos 1380, built on a 5nm process, generally offers stronger CPU and GPU performance, positioning it for more demanding tasks. The Snapdragon 695, on a 6nm process, is often chosen for its excellent power efficiency in budget-conscious devices.
Which processor is better for gaming, Exynos 1380 or Snapdragon 695?
The Exynos 1380, with its Mali-G68 MP5 GPU, is typically better suited for gaming. It can handle modern mobile games at higher graphics settings and frame rates more comfortably than the Adreno 619 GPU found in the Snapdragon 695.
Does the Snapdragon 695 support 5G?
Yes, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 includes an integrated Snapdragon X51 5G modem, providing support for Sub-6GHz 5G networks.
Which chip is more power-efficient?
The Snapdragon 695 is generally noted for its strong power efficiency, which often translates to longer battery life in smartphones. The Exynos 1380 is efficient for its performance level but may consume more power under heavy load due to its more powerful cores.
Can both chipsets handle high-resolution cameras?
Yes, but their support levels differ. The Exynos 1380 can typically support camera sensors up to 200MP, while the Snapdragon 695 supports sensors up to 108MP. The image signal processor (ISP) on the Exynos chip is also often more advanced.
Final Thoughts
The Samsung Exynos 1380 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 serve distinct segments within the mid-range market. The Exynos 1380 provides a more performance-oriented experience, with advantages in processing power, graphics capability, and support for newer features like Wi-Fi 6. It is typically found in devices that aim to offer a near-flagship experience in certain areas. Conversely, the Snapdragon 695 excels in delivering reliable, efficient performance for day-to-day use, often resulting in impressive battery life, and is a common choice for value-focused smartphones. The decision between the two ultimately depends on whether a user prioritizes higher performance for gaming and intensive apps or values maximum efficiency and battery longevity for standard usage.